patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

TELL US: What Should Scott Brown Do Next?

U.S. Senator Scott Brown will leave office in January. What should he do next?

 

 

U.S. Senator Scott Brown, a Republican, was defeated Tuesday by first time candidate Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat.

Warren will take office as the state's junior senator in January.

She'll replace Brown, who was elected in a special election in January 2010 when he defeated Democrat Martha Coakley.

In his concession speech on Tuesday night, Brown told his supporters that "defeat is only temporary."

As soon as the race was called, analysts began suggesting Brown may run for Massachusetts governor in 2014 or would seek the state's other U.S. Senate seat if Senator John Kerry is named Secretary of State under President Barack Obama in his second term.

What should Brown do next? Tell us in the comments.

Related Topics: Elizabeth Warren, Massachusetts Governor, Scott Brown, and U.S. Senate

stan knickle

11:33 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

sit back and rest wait for governor or senate seat to become available

Kathleen Brothers

11:45 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I agree I think he will cruise into the SENIOR senators job. Don't see him running for Governor.

Comment_arrow

TewksParent

1:47 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Brown would be the junior Senator, if Kerry leaves and Brown wins the special election. Warren would be the senior Senator.

mamie smith

11:56 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

let's not forget the guy signed Grover Norquist's pledge. Beyond the cute smile, has kissed the ring of the godfather.

Comment_arrow

TewksParent

1:49 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Why is pledging to not raise taxes a bad thing?

Tony

11:57 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Maybe Scott Brown should write another book? He seemed adept at using his fame as a U.S. Senator to sell his last one for profit almost the minute he was elected. Perhaps he should also use his free time to practice better manners in returning phone calls? I contacted his office twice concerning a problem I was having and never received the courtesy of a reply. Bye, bye Scotty. Wish I could say that I'm going to miss you, but...

Comment_arrow

Andrea

9:29 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

That's kind of funny because I contacted his office on a personal issue I needed help with and received a call back within 3 hours. He stood up for me, supported my issues and and got the job done for me when Misceli never even acknowledged by email or call, some state rep. he is. Scott Brown is a stand up guy, with class and has more care about the people in our state than anyone else. If you don't know him personally maybe you should get to know him before bashing him. All most voters know if what the campaign adds say about each other. He is a regular guy who didn't forget where he came from. There is a place for him in politics and I hope it is Gov. of our state.

Harry C.

11:58 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

He is a has-been. Will be forgotten by history. I notice all the "Brown" lawn signs around town have quietly been removed. HAHA

Comment_arrow

Josh Chace

3:09 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

As have the Warren, Obama, Romney, Tisei, etc signs. The elections over. Why would anyone leave anything up?

Comment_arrow

Alicia de la Garza

7:06 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

some of us still have signs up because we've been working so hard for our candidates that we pretty much collapsed from exhaustion as soon as the afterparty was over, and have barely gotten out of bed since.

Comment_arrow

getoutthetruth

12:23 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The Brown signs were stolen at such a pace (one off someone's house, accessed through their porch, isn't that a little invasive) we went through 500 signs in Woburn alone.

Shows you the high calliber of Mrs. Warren's honest supporters

Comment_arrow

Diana

12:32 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Or alternatively, your neighbors really don't like you.

Gene Pinkham

11:58 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

He has a MA Law License. Maybe he could represent asbestos victims against Elizabeth Warren?

Comment_arrow

Steve Meuse

7:20 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I wish there was a "like" button. That's hilarious lol.

Tony H.

11:58 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Go into private sector and make 5X as much.

broadway Jay

11:59 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

What about as a pundit on one of the cable news channels? This could be an easy transition for Scott Brown as he waits for another opportunity to arise.
I'd much prefer Scott than Dick Morris anytime!

Erik Royds

12:07 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Governor Patrick is on tap to run the Justice Dept. in the next Obama administration. Can you say Governor Brown?

Stella Peach

12:30 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Go home and drive around in his truck

quasimodo

12:48 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Sell his truck so he has some money and don't go on the dole, becoming one of the 47%!.

Charles Dell

1:03 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Please be more energetic and dress more appropriately as a politician rather than attempting to appeal to the average "Joe!"

Too, Make whatever attempt you have in mind to stay in politics, whether it be state or nationally, your credibility and integrity will overcome the recent defeat and ultimately, you will succed in your pusuit!

matt

1:22 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

probably wait until kerrys seat is empty and then probably make a run for it

Barry

1:57 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Get in his truck, take his $700 "barn coat" and all of the rest of his campaign props, and drive far, far away.

Comment_arrow

Bob

2:08 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Not qualified! He isn't a minority. Though he does have high cheek bones!

Ken

2:32 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Good man. Take Kerry's seat if he leaves or unseat Devalue. What do you expect in a state that reelects democrats who are in jail on conviction for bribery? After all, Warren was seeing clients in Mass while representing the insurance companies, without ever having obtained a license to practice law in Massachusetts. For most people, that is a felony.

Comment_arrow

John C.

2:18 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

You think Attorney General Martha would bother going after Warren. She is too busy going after the last previous State Treasurer who ran for Governor.

Brandon

3:16 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Very dissapointed that massachussetts would vote in a pawn that was brought into our state to take the senate seat just because shes a democrat. Liz Warren does not represent the people of Massachusetts. That said, Scott Brown and other republicans, have to adjust their stance on certain isssues if they want their party to survive. For instance, If Scott Brown were for gay marriage, he may have won. The American people have shown once again, that they (We) vote on social issues before financial issues. This is a problem, because at the end of the day, gay marriage and marijuana are not the most important issues of the day and should be among the last issues that are our deciding factors, especially when we are at war and soldiers are getting killed.

Comment_arrow

Leonardo DaVinci

3:52 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

So she was brought into this state as a pawn you say? She has been at Harvard Law School as a visiting Professor since 1992 and a permanent fixture and Harvard Law Professor since 1995, until recently. I think living here for 20 years qulifies her as a permanent resident, don't you?

Comment_arrow

Diana

6:56 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Breaking News; straight guy thinks gay rights no big deal. Stay tuned to hear him whine "But what about MEEEEEEEEEEEEE?!?!?!?"

Comment_arrow

Arthur DeLuca

11:05 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Yes, the Republican party DOES need to change. The news has been likiening them to a bunch of old white men stuck in the past; longing for an America that will not be coming back. They have placed them in the 1980's or so, but to me it's more like the 50's. Ghink the Nuclear Family sterotype that permeated the TV sitcoms of the 50's. That siad, Scott Brown is better than that, althoygh he still exhibits the Republican mindset of "help big biusiness and the people will be better off. (see my other post aways down). Until such time as the Republican Party cleans up its act and comes into 21st Century America, Scott Brown needs to leave it and become an actual independent (or unenrolled or whatever term is in fashion this week) and not be a Republican who calls himeself an independent. I think this is the only way he could win a seat in Massachusetts right now.

Comment_arrow

John C.

2:22 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

If the theory behind her is correct, she was supported by the party as they ruled out others and is leading the way for the new Congressman Kennedy to eventually run for Senator, but she has lived in this state quite awhile and so is a resident.

AHM

3:29 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Did Liz ever own an Oldsmobile?

Leonardo DaVinci

4:05 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I think since Scott Brown was 22 years old, he wanted to be an actor like Burt Reynolds when he posed semi-nude for Cosmopolitan Magazine, just like Burt did when he was a young man.I think he had and still has the looks and talent to be a fine actor and although it's just a guess on my part, I think that is what he had in mind as a young man, not politics. He is too bright to think that posing nude like Burt Reynolds did years before, would look good on his resume to be a politician. No he was thinking of being an actor, I bet!

Comment_arrow

commonsense

5:14 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

To Leonardo,
What has that got to do with Brown's record in the Mass. legislature or as our Senator? Are you a mind reader or just plain stupid?

david mokal

4:24 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Get out of Politics is what he should do.

Tim

5:45 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Got to love Mass . They re elect a crook up on the north shore who's was part of an off shore gambling ring . He knew nothing , yeah and the Boss's Boss had no idea there was booze in the house....

George Rebeiro Brooks Jr.

5:48 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Fire his re-election team which he should have done after that video they made.

J.longbow

6:07 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Apply for a job at the Charter School. Surely NK would hire him as a consultant to "buy at face value" another city park. Or he could take Hitchcock's job in the englisg Dept.

MJ

6:24 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

He needs to run again, in all the years I have lived here he is the first politician in MA I have ever felt represented me.

Comment_arrow

Jeanne Martin

9:20 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I'm glad you feel that way MJ. Scott Brown is a good man and is a great Senator. For starters he reads the bills he signs into U.S. Law. Imagine that. No wonder you feel he represents you.

Comment_arrow

Janellen27

12:43 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I'm glad you feel that way. Even if he didn't represent me on every issue, I was happy to have him there. Afterall, it's not just about Me, Me, Me. I trusted his judgment--especially when I had the opportunity to hear him speak freely when calling into radio stations explaining his votes. He's smart.

Diana

6:52 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I suppose "sit down and shut up" would be too much to hope for?

Comment_arrow

SomervilleGirl

9:23 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

YES....if only that could happen. He's got a fat ego, so I won't expect him to bow out gracefully.

SomervilleGirl

9:21 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Sell mortgages to armed forces, see if Cosmo is looking for seniors. He will never be able to win another seat in Massachusetts ever again. The guy is as useless is his boss the carpetbagger who couldn't decide whether his home was Salt Lake City or Belmont.

One of the biggest mistakes Brown made was voting against unemployment, when we had over a million people laid off and struggling to provide for their families. The day after he made this announcement, over one hundred angry, out of work, voters showed up at his state house office to protest. Soon after, he signed on to allow for the extensions. His office phone was answered by inexperienced staff, out of high school or college who couldn't answer why he voted against--citing it was for a very good reason and that they didn't know why, and to call back at a later time. Anyone who calls a senator's office is never greeted that way. He's unprofessional, a self-involved profiteer and a phoney, who has no clue about the working class--the pick up truck was his worst stunt ever because they guy is worth millions. Good riddance.

Comment_arrow

John C.

8:08 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Sounds like you didn't like him Somerville Girl, but look who you now have in his place. She is a fraud beyond anyone we have elected to office in a long time. A native american? Defending a corporation against victims? Thanks to people who supported for her like you we have very poor representation.

Comment_arrow

commonsense

5:25 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Why are liberals so hateful? Did you ever bother to look at his record of 2 years compared with our Senior Senator of 30 Years who has done nothing for the citizens of Massachusetts? Now we have another liberal democrat who will do whatever the party bosses tell her. The question you should be asking is why do we have 23 million people out of work after 4 years of Obama? Oh yes, I forgot. It's all Bush's fault. Will you still be blaming Bush in 2013 when the Obamacare taxes take effect? We lost 2 good men on Tuesday because of uninformed liberals like you.

Jules

9:30 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Diana,
You are quite rude. This was a legitimate question from the author. Doubt you would say something like this out in public, you seem like just another bully hiding behind the computer. And yes, I would say this to you face to face.

Comment_arrow

Diana

7:30 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Jules, that was a legitimate answer. In fact, the majority of the people of Massachusetts just told him quite directly to sit down and shut up.

Comment_arrow

Mike G.

7:49 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I don't think Diana was telling the author to sit down and shut up. Reading comprehension is your friend.

Comment_arrow

Diana

7:57 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Wait, what? Why on earth would I be telling the author to sit down and shut up? Why would anyone think that?

Um... okay, just to clarify; I meant Scott Brown. Scott Brown should sit down and shut up.

Comment_arrow

Jules

10:51 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Diana: I've read your posts all over the Patch. You hate Scott Brown, got it, You are entitled to your opinion, just as I am, but I still think your response was childish and disrespecful.
Mike G:. I was referring to Diana's response about what Scott Brown should do in the future. Reading comprehension is your friend too.

Comment_arrow

Diana

11:03 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Well, I don't hate Scott Brown, but I don't respect him either and see no reason to pretend otherwise.

For what it's worth, I find your posts humorless and obtuse..

Ronald

10:27 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

He votes both democratic and Republican. Exactly the way it should be but people around here are so stuck up their parties behind, they just have to vote democratic. This country will never move forward with that kind of thinking.

SomervilleGirl

6:13 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Yeah, he probably goes both ways in other respects, not when it comes to his constituency he's all about backing his buddies on wall street and Bain. He's fooled those who voted for him and if he lived up to his promises, maybe he would still be there. Once voted in office. They usually stay heust have done a poor job. It shows

Comment_arrow

commonsense

5:41 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

You are part of the liberal crowd who cannot think for themselves. Your insulting remarks reflect your ignorance. Wait until Warren is sworn in and shows her Harvard liberalism. Show me a liberal democrat who has lived up to their promises. Let's hope the Republicans can make a comeback and give us representation that we are lacking in this state. Brown is a good, hardworking man who did a great job. Too bad the liberals in this state are too blind to recognize quality when it appears. I guess they are just used to Mass. legislators like the last 3 Speakers of the House who are convicted felons.

David Marsters

7:18 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Scott, pack your bags and move out of most screwed up state in the union. Sell everything and buy a motor home and tour the USA. Life is to short, enjoy it while u can before the socialists takes everything from you. I remember the good times with you at Camp Curtis Guild Reading, Ma.

John C.

8:13 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Very likely he will be back to run for either Governor or to replace Kerry, when he is chosen by Obama for some important position. However, this is a strong Democratic state and it's difficult for a Republican to win anything, as was seen by Warren a complete fraud to replace him.

Comment_arrow

Arthur DeLuca

12:54 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I'll say it again - Scott Brown should leave the Republican Party and become a true independent. The whole Party system is somewhat foolish., I think. If being a Party member means you must, think, act and vote "the party way" then one candidate from a party is no better (or worse ) than another. If all think alike,hen when a problem arises that one politician can't resolve, none will be able to, since all think one mindset.
On the other hand, if one is truly an individual thinker, votes what they think is best (which is what all SHOULD be doing), then what's the point of joining a Party - why be beholdne to them? I like the way Medford does it with their local offices, even though the politicians may belong to a particular party, they all run as individuals. It's possible for both candidates (or 6 for School Committee, 7 for City Council) to belong to the same party, different parties or no partry at all. It's the indiviual who is put into office, not the Party.

david mokal

8:33 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

@ John C I think your right Obama will take him in and give him a job in the white house as well as Romney. Thats my prediction.

Comment_arrow

John C.

9:08 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Anything is possible David. Whatever Obama does it better be real good, because his first four years have been a disaster. The economy is in a mess. There is plenty of blame to go around but he is also responsible with his policies and the ones he is still proposing. Lets face it we are in turmoil. While all the people here think the Republicans are the problem and continue to do so, Obama needs to step up and look at what will help stimulate growth, not stimulate unions and government jobs, but small business, small corporations and anything that encourages industry to invest here and not other countries. By the way to be fair to Romney, General Motors and Chrystler are really sending work to other countries. We need that work here.

Comment_arrow

commonsense

5:46 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Kerry wants to be Secretary of State to replace Hillary. He can then mess up our foreign policy just as Hillary and Obama have done. At least he will be out of Massachusetts. Hopefully, Deval will take a cabinet job from his highness, Obama. If he becomes Attorney General, God help us all. We can look forward to 4 more years of our Constitution being trashed.

Paul Tress

8:39 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

If Brown wants to show his bipartisanship and position himself as a candidate for Governor or against Kerry, he should immediately make a deal where he resigns as Senator and have the Governor appoint Warren. This would give the state more seniority in committees for Warren and make Brown look heroic and show his bipartisanship.

Comment_arrow

John C.

8:54 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Now Paul do you really think a Democrat would actually do that if it was the other way around? Also the only thing that would really help Brown is to switch parties and that's also not going to happen.

Rick Catino

9:11 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

As I recall, Brown wasn't "memorable" a a State Rep or State Senator; that is, he did little good but also little harm. I'm not sure his term as US Senator was much different in my view. He seems like an intelligent and decent man (excepting his - imho - somewhat racist and demeaning behavior in the debate) who will make out well no matter what he chooses to do....

david mokal

9:38 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

What I would like to know is what did Brown do? Enlighten me. Did he create any jobs? Did he help the poor? How about the vets. Talked about it but did NUTTA !

Comment_arrow

John C.

9:57 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Really David? He did nothing at all huh? Your talking to the wrong person since I am a war veteran and he is very supportive to the armed services and veterans.

Comment_arrow

Mike G.

9:59 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

List Scott Brown's accomplishments.

Comment_arrow

Arthur DeLuca

10:57 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

What he did was put in "pork" for Massachusetts for his signature on the Healthcare bill. He got a certain classification of business (one that Mass is heavy in - I forget which one) exempted form paying a bigger bite on insurance/taxes/whatever to supplement the costs of the new law.This means that the people have to chip in the difference that this business class doesn't put in. Once again we have a Republican helping out big business under the diguise of helping out the people. That's why, in my opinion, he needed to go.

Comment_arrow

John C.

2:07 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Well Mike G. I don't need to list Brown's accomplishments. You can could easily access them yourself, since all of Congress and the Senate have what they did listed under their websites and government websites. I know what he has done, but find it yourself. Why should I make it easier for you to argue even what he has accomplished. He also explained what he had done in his campaign lierature, his campaign site, the debates and interviews. Go look it all up. Unless of course you really don't care, which I think you really don't and what's the sense, because he will be done soon. Then you can assess Warren's accomplishments.

Comment_arrow

commonsense

5:50 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

He has done more in 2 years than Kerry has in 30 years. How has Kerry helped the poor or the veterans? It was Brown, the freshman senator, who introduced and got passed, the bill to eliminate insider trading from Congress. Why didn't Kerry or other veteran senators do it?

linita

10:56 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Senator Brown did a great job as he demonstrated his desire to work with both sides. Unfortunately, ms Warren will raise taxes as she asserted she would. It boggles the mind that MA voters seem to relish high taxes when we have no improvements to anything to show for the higher revenues. Scott Brown should run for Kerry's seat and perhaps for the first time we will have someone occupying that seat who takes pride in getting things done as opposed to voting the part line and playing puppet to whichever dem president is in office.

Comment_arrow

John C.

2:09 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I agree but this is Massachusetts. That rarely happens here and Scott Brown was very rare one to accomplish it.

DonnaD

11:44 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I think he should spend the time out of learning contemplating the mistakes he and his team made while campaigning. My husband and I generally vote Republican although we are unenrolled, but his negative campaign style turned us both off. He was particularly condescending towards Ms. Warren during the debates, calling her "Professor" as though it were a dirty word. He really damaged his "nice guy" image. A few years out of office to gain some humility will be a good thing.

Comment_arrow

John C.

2:12 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Donna I doubt you were going to vote for him. If you voted for Warren, her background isn't very honest and clean. She will very likely vote as her party votes even if it's not in agreement with you.

Comment_arrow

DonnaD

7:29 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I did vote for him against Coakley, but this campaign really turned me off. However, he made a wonderful concession speech--where was that man during the latter half of the campaign? Like I said, I hope he learns from this.

Comment_arrow

Diana

8:11 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

John C., I freely admit that I wouldn't have voted for him regardless, but his campaign was sleazy as hell, and very poorly run. Warren's Native American heritage is like Obama's birth certificate; all the smart sane people had moved way on, but he clung to it, giving the impression it was all he had to cling to. Then he decided he needed to court women (smart) so he lied about his record (dumb). He ran on the "bipartisan" thing (seriously, he came thiiiiiiiisclose to shouting "I'm not like those other @holes!!!") but if you're touting your "independence" then it would be an awful lot smarter to run as an independent. He consistently came off as condescending, arrogant, and dismissive.

I voted for Coakley in 2010, but I freely admit she ran a crappy (lazy, complacent) campaign, and it cost her. Surely you can at least admit that he ran a truly craptacular campaign.

JT

12:51 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Senator Scott Brown's accomplishments in office are easily referenced & too long to fit in this comment section--do the job & look it up--on official gov't. websites--not from the everyday media that no longer reports factual news untill they slant it to their liking. The energy used to express snide/uncalled for rhetoric here would be better utilized by working to help change the debilitating circumstances our country is still in; wise cracks won't solve our national debt, provide millions of unemployed people with jobs, or fix a foreign policy in shambles--remember Benghazi is still under investigation & we don't know why no one helped our 4 brave fellow Americans who are dead. Frequently many MA voters are willing to put people of little or no character in office. Fortunately, others of us are proud to have done something different from that when we elected Senator Brown to office in 2010. With great integrity, he represented many of us here for the 1st time in decades & always made the best interests of MA folks his priority. (BTW-the "election heard 'round the world" will go in the history books.) Criticisms of Brown in these comments pale next to Warren's questionable past record--one she'll surely enhance as her fraudulent persona & progressive/socialist ideology play out on the Senate floor. The Patch would better serve its readers by asking this more pertinent & critical question: When Warren goes to DC, what do you expect her to do for you & our state & our country?

Comment_arrow

Dave Gray

2:17 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Pretty clever. First you say Brown's record is easily referenced. Then you tell the reader to look it up him or her self. Then you go on to slam Mass voters, Obama, Warren, and finally Patch. And you did this all by stating your opinion about Brown without being specific about anything..

Here's a tip for you, JT - it's the writer's responsibility to cite facts that back up his assertions, not the reader's. What you wrote reads like a press release from the Brown campaign. You're entitled to your opinion, but don't expect anyone to give any credence to what you write until you cite facts to backs your assertions.

Comment_arrow

John C.

2:31 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Well Dave Gray, I support what JT says, you can be clever and look it up. It's all past now isn't it? Meaning it's all recorded. He did accomplish quite a bit in his short time in office. It's easily to look up. It was a huge campaign and it was all presented. Unless you didn't watch or listen.

Comment_arrow

Diana

5:23 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Elizabeth Warren also had quite a bit to say about her achievements, which you no doubt dispute. You called her dishonest, without acknowledging that Scott Brown expressly LIED about the very voting record you're referring us to. I guess it all depends on what you consider an "achievement" and whom you're willing to make excuses for.

Ruby

2:04 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

He lost because he was a RHINO. Republican in name only. Dems did not vote for him because he ran on the republican ticket, and republicans because see above.

Comment_arrow

ron johnson

3:07 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

David Gray,
I for one after reading these posts for the past few months, find little comfort in "facts". As we have seen, there are many ways that facts can be slanted, and used to back up pretty much any position. I do have one thought though, for those who want to claim he did little while in office, please remember he was there for less than 2 years. What has Kerry done in all the years he has served. I would argue he has served with little distinction and has a failed WH run on his resume. To Diane, I guess he should have shut up and sat down as you want Scott Brown to do. Apparently losing one election only disqualifies people whom you do not chose to support.

Comment_arrow

Mike G.

1:14 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Why let "facts" get in the way of some good ol' fashioned ranting?

mary stewart

2:42 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Senator Brown will succeed at whatever position or profession he chooses to pursue. He is a problem solver, who faced adversity at a young age. Overcoming adversity develops strength of character. He is not a quitter. If he was the Democratic party wouldn't have spent so much money to defeat him. Senator Brown has been very responsive to his constituents both Republican, Democratic and independents during his short period in office. A young paralyzed naval cadet is one of the many who have made that response public. Go Scott!!!!

Ruby

3:08 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Yeah that was the problem Ms. Stewart, He was all 'I am for it, I am against it" and not sticking to the GOP ideals , In other words just like Romney [ and a big part of the reason he did not get elected was that he was a flip floper ] Read Rino. If he was an Independant then why did he not run as such?

Comment_arrow

commonsense

5:58 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

To Ruby and all the other liberals: You will soon find out how mistaken you are to vote Scott Brown out and to not have Mitt Romney as President. Hold onto your pocketbooks because we are about to have increased taxes like we have never seen before. You have re-elected a president based on what the mainstream media allowed you to know instead or reporting the news. Shame on them and shame on those who can't be bothered to understand what is happening to our country.

david mokal

5:45 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

The main reason he didnt get elsected is because of that jerk Ryan he took along with him a Marxist Extremist. Vouchers for health care??? Wha we stupid or sumthin? Extreme cuts in medicare? Not to mention we 47% who are worthless POS's he thought we were.

Comment_arrow

Janellen27

12:39 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

David, if that's why Romney didn't get elected, then tell me why Obama DID get elected? You may not understand my question unless you saw "2016".

Comment_arrow

Diana

12:51 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

And if you saw "2016" and believed a word of it, you may not understand much of anything.

Comment_arrow

Arthur DeLuca

1:06 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I think Nixon was the last Vice president to later become President through elections. Nowadays it seems fashionable to pick a (use your own term for an unqualified running mate here) as impeachment insurance. If you impeach the President and manage to get him (or her), the Vice President automatically becomes President. If the Veep is a real (use that term you picked again), then you won't dare try to get the President removed from office.j

Terry Dineen

7:43 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I believe he should go back to modelling for Cosmo.

Comment_arrow

Janellen27

12:39 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Terry, that would be a waste of a good American and a rational mind.

Comment_arrow

Diana

12:55 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Weren't you leaving?

Janellen wishes she knew how to quit us. And Scott Brown. She's just not good at knowing when things are over.

John C.

9:42 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Yeah Diana I'm not sure if you will see this, but as a reply to your comment to me I do agree Scott Brown could have done some things differantly in his campaign and yes I did get somewhat tired of the native american comments, though she was dishonest in how she presented herself. It actually did give her a dishonest boost at Harvard, whether you like to believe that or not. She was also not honest about some of the work she ahd done. Your voting for Coakly and now Warren only tells me that even if Scott Brown came across as a great guy to you, you still would never had voted for him. Now we will see whether you made the correct choice in voting for Warren, that is if you like many others won't just look the other way if she isn't as good as you hoped. Thanks for commenting back. Though we may not agree it's great to have the discussion with people like you.

Comment_arrow

Diana

9:48 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

John, it's not about what I "like" to believe, it's about the fact that no one has ever been able to definitively point out what benefit it gave her. And yeah, even if I thought Scott Brown was a great guy, I wouldn't vote for him because I disagree with his policy opinions. They're politicians, I only care about their policy positions. I don't need to like them, because I am never, in fact, going to have a beer with them. We're not gonna hang out.

And thank you too, civility can be so refreshing. ;)

John C.

10:12 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I agree with you Diana, it's a politicians views, policy positions and how they vote that is important to me, not like I would be best friends with them. I rather have a beer with people like you, who would tell me what they really think, than a politician, though it would be intersting to see what a politician says if they were under the influence. You may a more honest answer.

Janellen27

11:17 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I think it's pathetic that this country doesn't seem to know the difference between the good guys and the bad guys anymore. God help us in the next four years. Who's Obama going to blame now for the last four!

Comment_arrow

Diana

11:36 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Perhaps god is already helping you, by giving you the opportunity to consider that you may have misinterpreted his will and should search your heart for some humility.

DannyBoy

11:46 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Scott Brown still has a future in politics at the state or national levels. He should run for John Kerry's Senate seat, if that opens up, or for the MA governor's seat. He is still young and has a lot to offer, however, if I were his political advisor, I would tell him to cut down on his negative ads the next time he runs for office, and focus more on his voting record and accomplishments during his 2-year term at the US Senate.

Comment_arrow

Janellen27

12:36 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

DannyBoy: Think he'd be better as a Senator or as a Governor? (Nothing could be worse than what we have now.) Either is fine with me, but I haven't thought it through yet. Which would you like to see?

Comment_arrow

DannyBoy

12:50 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Janellen27, I think either office will be suitable for him. MA voters have a tendency to vote Republican for governor, as witnessed in past elections, with the exception of Deval Patrick's two terms, to counter-balance a heavily Democrat state legislature. And he can definitely count on his two years of experience at the US Senate if he runs for Kerry's seat. Either way, Brown has the name recognition in the state and the background and experience to win, and he's by far the most popular GOP politician in the state.

Janellen27

12:05 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Diana: What the hell are you talking about. Misinterpreted WHOSE will -- Scott's? God's? Or, Satan's! Don't preach humility; it makes you sound like you're better than God's Human Race!

Oh, I see. You're probably one who thinks O walks on water. Remember your Bible prophecies, and how you will be fooled. . . .

GOD HELP AMERICA!

Comment_arrow

Diana

12:10 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I was mocking you. And your god, just a little, but mostly you. Sorry if I was unclear about that.

SomervilleGirl

12:07 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I cannot believe you people are still crying about Scott Brown....get over it! He will survive.

He has a wife who works and I'm sure she is tired of him too, just like the rest of us.

The guy never passed one bill of legislation when he was a state rep and has been hanging off of Romney's coat tails ever since. He is rude and crude--remember his comment about "Hey guys my daughters are available", when he won Teddy's seat. He has never accepted his gay constituency, or people of color and race, he is against women's rights --a Neo-Con supporter all the way. Maybe Hollywood would have been a better choice--the guy sure can ACT! But only some of us can see through his pretentious, conceited, arrogance.

I hope Kennedy will eventually get Kerry's seat--because Kerry would want it that way! Brown is going no where in politics because he proved that he is unworthy of the senate seat.

Just because he drives a beat up pick up and wears a construction jacket, it does not make him a working class supporter. You guys are hopeless.

Comment_arrow

Janellen27

12:22 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Oh, yes, THE KENNEDY'S! Not one of them--not Joseph the Patriarch, Teddy, JFK, RFK, nor their extended family men--were ever "rude and crude". Wake up. The comment about Scott's daughter being "available" (not "free", as you said) was joke--a little family joke. It could have been any family. No, he ISN"T "against Women's Rights"! You drank the kool-aide! He has a contemporary wife and two very contemporary daughters who wouldn't be sharing living quarters with him if he was against women's rights. What you probably don't get--and, didn't get to hear him explain--is that it was the "right cause, wrong bill"! He has very rational reasons for turning down bills. Too bad you never stuck around to hear him explain his choices.

Janellen27

12:12 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

DIANA: My eye just caught the comment that you "don't respect Scott Brown". Tell me, if you can't respect a man who is loved by his family, is a Colonel in the Armed Forces, is an Attorney and was raised democrat and chose republican (which means he understands both sides and the middle), then who on earth do you "respect". And, doesn't God tell you to "respect" all? "Sit down and shut up" doesn't sound very respectful.

Good Lord . . .

SomervilleGirl

12:16 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Diana,

I'm beginning to think that the majority of Scott groupies on this forum are his neighbors.

Comment_arrow

Diana

12:19 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I think it's more likely that some of them never stopped reading Cosmo. "He's soooooo dreeeeeeaaaaaamy!!! <3"

Janellen27

12:31 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Diana & Somerville Girl: If neither of you like Scott Brown, why then, would you bother to come to a thread just to add your poison. Mock this: "Sit down and shut up."

Outtahere. As long as there are people like you two in a thread, there is nothing accomplished past grade-school level.

YUP, I think Brown still has a future, and I'm hoping to see him take Kerry's seat, too. As for Kerry. . . . don't appreciate him in Mass. or DC. Deval will go to DC, too, and before long, he'll take Lantigua with him, and that doesn't even seem remotely feasible, but then again, neither did Patrick's second term! Nor Barak's! Gotta love those Illegals! They sure know how to vote!

Comment_arrow

Diana

12:37 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

By the way, y'all are freakin' hilarious with the "He'll win Kerry's seat!" thing. He couldn't win HIS OWN seat. Now that's mockable.

SomervilleGirl

12:40 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Janellen27,

Are you a friend of the family? Sounds like it. I've heard this before. They are obsessed with themselves to the point they track what people are saying on line. Remember all his daughter's adoring fans on Facebook after his comments to the male audience? PLEASE. Save it for someone who is not educated about the Brown's. People who parade around in public like they are so special, are just the opposite in private. There were many people who did not take his comment as a joke because it was in very poor taste. What father of true moral character is going to offer up his two daughters on stage in front of the entire nation as he is accepting victory to the senate? He was an absolute disgrace to himself, his entire family and uninformed voters.

The Kennedy Family has done more for the working class than Scott Brown could ever dream of doing. Every family has their own issues, but when you have someone like Scott Brown who takes a paycheck from the people of Massachusetts, it is expected that he do his job! And do it well.

The people of Massachusetts were obviously very unhappy with him in his very SHORT TENURE as Senator and I'm sure there are many reasons why he couldn't cut it. It has nothing to do with the liberals of this state and more about what he lacks in brain power.

Beauty is temporary--brains are forever. Maybe instead of using "stardom" as the main attraction, he should try being a real person and teaching his family to be that way as well.

Comment_arrow

Janellen27

1:06 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I agree with parts of your post, but I'm confused as to why you keep mixing up "Kennedy" with "Brown". You said it was the Brown's who were obsessed with themselves? And, Brown is not working class? And, WHO was about to disgrace himself?

Joe Kennedy, Actress Mistress
JFK, Marilyn Monroe Mistress
RFK, Marily Monroe Mistress, two-for-one!
JFK & Dave Powers: Oral Sex from the same woman at the pool
TED: Anyone with a bottle was a Mistress
Willy: Rape? (Not guilty doesn't mean "Innocent", but thanks to Uncle Teddie . . .
Scakel(sp): Murder?
Caroline: Husband Cheater
Jackie: Married a man purely for money, had her affairs, too, but I don't blame her!

Made all of us Irish Catholics proud!

Comment_arrow

Mike G.

1:09 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Meh, I could not care less who politicians are sleeping with, just as much as they should not care whom I, nor anyone else is sleeping with.

Comment_arrow

A Taker

7:51 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

It shows the content of their character. And yours.

Comment_arrow

Diana

7:56 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I agree. Obsessing over other people's sex lives reveals one to be jealous, petty, and of limited intelligence.

Comment_arrow

A Taker

8:20 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

It shows the content of their character. And yours.

Comment_arrow

Diana

8:54 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

See that, it drives people to distraction, causing them to repeat themselves. For your own sake man, put the lotion down and try to think about something else.

Comment_arrow

A Taker

10:02 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Diana, you reveal yourself more and more with each post. Thank you for continually making me feel better about myself.

Comment_arrow

Diana

10:08 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

A Taker, please stop making yourself feel good by imagining me revealing myself. It's icky.

getoutthetruth

12:40 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Mrs. Warren had a press conference with Govenor Patrick. When asked the tough questions neither wanted or could answer, including the Senator-elect who campaigned on 3 sentences. Truly pathetic for a genius "Harvard" law professor who was making $350k for teaching 1 class and campaigning on keeping college tuition costs down!

Brown is a good man who didn't hide his wife and kids and never pretended to be something he isn't.

But because he dared to run as an R rather than as a D he was demonized and ripped to shreds by lies.

That is also truly pathetic.

Comment_arrow

Janellen27

12:58 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

getoutthetruth: I know! Wasn't that embarrassing--for each of them! And, quite frightening, too! Reminded me of the last time a woman turned to Deval to answer her question on camera . . . . oh, brother.

Janellen27

12:41 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Commonsense: I agree totally, but it's not JUST about the money. They have no idea what we're in for now.

Janellen27

12:45 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

JeanneMartin: Oh, thanks for reminding me. . . YES, he does read the bills! How many can say that? And, that's why he votes the way he votes. He knows what's in the bills and that includes the fine print.

SomervilleGirl

12:53 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Janellen27,

Are you suggesting that Diana and I leave the forum?

Now I'm convinced she's in their camp. Can't take criticism, can they? Well that's part of politics. It's not all glory.

Maybe they tried Hollywood and that didn't work out either....oh well.

Next time he write a book on child rape, he should donate all proceeds to help victims. Then maybe he might get some respect and sympathy. Strange, he didn't feel compelled to write the book years ago, before being elected senator.

It may not have received the same recognition if he were only a model for Cosmo.

Comment_arrow

A Taker

7:47 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

What you and Diana "contribute" to this forum is not criticism. Your contributions are not informational. They are pathetic attempts at humor and sarcasm.

Leonardo DaVinci

1:10 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The Romney/Brown supporters had all the answers before the election, then they get bitch slapped up and down and over and out, lose the election, and guess what, they still have all the answers. Those darn Republicans, legends in their own minds, worshipers of Karl Rove's Machiavellian concepts of deceit and duplicity in politics, but thankfully not the rest of the country. The question "no commonsense" was what should Brown do now and I answered the question honestly, that he should go back and do what he always wanted to do and become a professional big screen actor. He has had 2 years of great performances as a US Senator. All he needs now is a talent agent and he can't miss. Don't worry about Scott Brown, he's like a cat, he'll always land on his feet.

SomervilleGirl

1:12 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Diana,

I'm not leaving.....and yes, I agree, they need to accept the fact that Scott Brown just couldn't do the job and that's why he got the boot.

I guess they didn't have enough of his crooked friends in Wall Street who ran off with trillions from taxpayers pensions, jobs, homes and savings. Just think the grief we have been able to avoid with Mitt not becoming president. I guess Scott was hoping to stay on those coat tails and get a new job in D.C.

Well guess what....looks like you're on your own now, Scott. Maybe those lobbyists in DC can carve something out for you....then again, they might be keeping it all for themselves. A new sheriff is in town and she's going after the criminals who tanked our economy.

Looks like there may be more billionaires heading for greener pastures--not the green they had in mind, south of the border green. That money in Cayman must be looked after before the IRS brings in the big guns for all that tax evasion and ripping off investors world wide. The rich have threatened to leave the U.S.--I'll help them pack! Good riddance to them all and to all the Scott Browns in the world....we are so much better off without you!

SomervilleGirl

1:26 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Look up Kennedy's record on legislation if you can figure out how.

Janellen27

1:30 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Diana
12:51 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

And if you saw "2016" and believed a word of it, you may not understand much of anything

Yes, Diana. You bet I saw it! And, I didn't believe EVERYTHING I heard in the movie--only the words that were coming out of Barak Obama's mouth! And, I would bet money you didn't see the film at all, based on your attitude. . . or, pretty much on all your attitudes. You really know how to turn a legitimate discussion into a RomperRoom Free-for-All. Very productive of you and your sidekick. It's hard to pick through all of the garbage here to find the posts from those respecatable people who actually came here for a mature discussion.

Janellen27

1:31 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

TO: The Person who posted that Scott should have run as an Independent. He pretty much is an Independent, isn't he? But, when was the last time anyone won the Senatorial Race as an Independent? He had to pick one in order to win.

Comment_arrow

Diana

1:48 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

And how'd that work out?

SomervilleGirl

1:32 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Diana,
She's crying because her husband told her they have to move to Mexico because he refuses to pay taxes to Obama and the IRS is going after their off shore tax haven account.

Janellen27

1:33 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Diana: WhitepeoplemourningRomney???? Is that your problem? Racism? Oh, I see. Well, then, conversation sure is over.

Comment_arrow

Diana

1:45 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Says the woman who blamed the election results on "illegals."

Janellen27

1:40 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

TO The person who said something about .. . .

Well, if I had had my way, Bill Clinton would have been thrown out of The White House. He lied to The Grand Jury, lied to The American People, lied to his Wife, was Impeached. . . and, STILL won't get off the stage! I always said, since prior to his election, a man who lies to his wife will lie to his Country. Bill proved that to be true (as have all the Kennedy's). But, since he carried the whole thing out on TV and in other forms of media, he should have been thrown out like yesterday's trash. He lived in The People's White House, worked for The People, and screwed around on the job and lied through his teeth about the whole mess costing millions of dollars of The People's money. And, he just bought himelf four more years of facetime! Ugh!

Comment_arrow

Diana

1:55 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Pretty sure it was the Republicans who kept it in the news every day and spent millions on prosecution. Just sayin'.

Mike G.

1:41 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Janellen, you seem to be pretty butthurt over people who cheat. What's up with that? Why do you care?

Comment_arrow

Janellen27

2:45 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Mike G.: The conversation eluded to Scott Brown's lack of ethics, etc.. Someone said The Kennedy's were such fine people, but Scott Brown was lacking in morals. I countered that with few examples where Kennedy's lacked personal ethics and morals, as opposed to Scott's "joke" on stage about his daughters being unattached.

In general, I feel that the highest job position in the country should be represented by a man or woman with the highest personal character, morals, ethics, and above all--Integrity. The examples I cited, including Clinton, point out that these people have little going for them in those departments. Like I said, "a man who lies to his wife will lie to his country, no problem." I don't like my Presidents lying to me. I'm not alone.

Now, if you would like I can go on to describe lack of Integrity exhibited by each in business dealings and such, but . . . no, not worth the time.

Comment_arrow

Janellen27

3:19 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

MIKE G.: General Patrais(sp) was just forced to resigned due to an affair he had. That's the given reason, and many already think there's more to the story of a political nature--e.g., Bengazi, however, on the surface, his affair has brought a man in very high standing shame enough to resign. Amazing. (Of course, most of the Washington Insiders, members of Congress, etc., see hookers, have affairs, and all, but . . . 'for some reason', this lapse in judgment is enough to warrant a resignation. Hhmmm. . . Code of Conduct . . . .

SomervilleGirl

1:45 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Posing with two daughters in string bikinis, without wife....who could that be. Is that what good fathers do?

Comment_arrow

Mike G.

1:46 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Didn't he offer up his daughter on national TV? Man oh man! Did Cosmo teach him nothing?!

Leonardo DaVinci

8:00 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

It's not that hard to put in a vote for a piece of legislation that Pubs know Brown's vote would not matter, so he gets the nod to vote with the Dems, so later they can drag out the phoney proposition that he was the most bi-partisan Senator in the "whole" world. That is how deceit and duplicity work. Pubs know all the angles accept what we the people want. I keep hearing statements on this thread that espresses hope, that Congress should learn to get together in Washington. Well you know that's what's wrong with the system presently. Congress mostly cares about the people at election time, only. Both parties think it's about them and do what they think is right or wrong, but voters needs must be met first, and all of us must START DEMANDING that they quit the dysfunctional attitutes and start working for America. Republicans lost this election and and have to step back and regroup. Their ideas are not selling and that should be crystal clear., Republican candidates should soon get rid of men like Karl Rove, the political startegist who revels in every piece of sleazy campaign ad he can think of. The worshiper of the Machiavellian Political Philosophy and inventor of the "Big Lie" theory should get the boot. He is not good for the Pubs and he is not good for America. This Machavellian psychopath thinks he can win elections by bending and twisting reality to unacceptable standards. He got Bush W. elected but he is too divisive and should be given his walking papers.

Phil E

8:38 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

He should continue to be the decent man he has been. Massachusetts never fails to disappoint us.

SomervilleGirl

8:49 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

This must be the other sour patch who were promised jobs.

david mokal

8:59 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Holy Crap ! Enough already. It's over. Time to move on. Don't let politics wear you down. Enjoy the day. Enough of this crap for me.

JK P

9:00 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

No just someone who isn't part of your sheeple mentality. I have a job, try it sometime you might like it. Though you will get upset that you work and others live off the taxes you pay.

Janellen27

2:37 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

SomervilleGirl & Diana: Could you please tell me who each of you works for? I would like to invite your Employers to get a closer, more realistic view of who is representing their business. Oh, you work for yourselves? But, of course; your only choice.

Comment_arrow

Diana

6:06 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Actually, I work for your husband. It's kind of a funny story...

SomervilleGirl

3:20 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Janeellen27,

You are in violation of Patch policies.

Janellen27

3:39 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

SomervilleGirl: If you are so aware of the rules, why then, do you keep violating them?

Patch_comments_icon

Matt Schooley

4:37 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Just a reminder to all of our commenters. Please refrain from negative comments against each other and stick to the topic of the article. Thank you.

Rick Catino

5:47 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Based on the recommendation of some of the posters here, I took the time and went to look up Browns achievements. I can't find anything beyond sponsorship of a bill on insider trading (kind of a no-brainer I think). So to those of you who believe he is a "great man", what am I missing?

SomervilleGirl

6:05 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Rick,
Here is the history of Scott Brown:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Brown

Aside from being a state rep, but not creating any legislature worthy of recognition, in the National Guard since he was 19, but no active duty, and his pose in Cosmo, I don't see much else.

When I discovered he has several or more mansions, totaling in the millions along with matched savings, he lost all hope in convincing me and hundreds of other educated voters that he was far from "working class".

There was a letter on bluemassgroup.com during the senate election when the seat was vacant, from one of his former opponents. In the letter, she outlines numerous events which took place in his home town where his constituency came forward to complain about the manner in which they were treated--his daughters teacher who received verbally abusive phone calls, to the guy at the neighborhood grocery store who was dismissed, and gays he refused to acknowledge lived in his district.

I volunteered for Capuano's campaign during this election and aside from being a dedicated constituent of Mike, because he's also someone who always works very hard for his constituency and is heavily involved in legislation, working well with both sides--I had made up my mind early on that Scott Brown was nothing more than a self-involved opportunist. If I can locate that letter from his former opponent, I will post it. Constituents don't lie--why would they?

Comment_arrow

Diana

6:12 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Well, there was that one time as a state rep that he voted against state funding for 9/11 first responders but for state funding of a golf course. I suppose that was notable.

SomervilleGirl

6:21 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Would this be because he can't golf?

Rick Catino

6:36 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Maybe that's why some folks think they're too long too list There aren't any.

SomervilleGirl

6:44 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

First two comments about sum it up--as one person here noted:

"I downloaded Scott Brown's entire voting record and the only time he did not vote with the Republican agenda was when he knew a bill favoring the middle class only had a few votes and therefore, no chance of passing with or without his vote...it was safe and politically expedient to vote on our side. He could pretend he was for us and not risk offending his party. In all other votes, he consistently voted with his wealthy senators for all bills that would preserve their low tax rate while preventing any tax relief for the middle class. Scott Brown is not for us. He's not bipartisan by any stretch of the imagination. If you want the real facts, go to Vote Smart.com and type in Scott Brown's name".

http://grafton.dailyvoice.com/politics/scott-brown-visits-grafton-stumps-womens-issues

SomervilleGirl

6:46 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Second comment from grafton.dailyvoice:

"What dishonesty from Senator Brown. He was not a U.S. Senator when Lily Ledbetter was signed early in President Obama's term and became law. And most important, Lily Ledbetter is not about equal pay. It is about the timing of litigation about pay discrimination in the workplace. He voted against the fair pay act and when asked about it on talk radio I was shocked to hear him say that it would become a burden for businesses. He said women discriminated against could go to discrimination agencies and the courts. There was no expression of concern from Senator Brown about the burden that would place on women along with the certainty that they would be out of employment while they fought about being paid unfairly. Senator Brown may live in a house full of women, but he is not fighting for all women. Also, woman are more than half of all working families. The Republican Senator Brown would work for the 1% and be part of the Republican agenda. He is not for all of us. He'll side with corporations every time".

He's for women's rights?

Jeremy

6:49 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Any openings at Big Apple Circus?

Janellen27

8:03 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

DIANA: "Actually, I work for your husband. It's kind of a funny story..."

Would that be the husband I had 25 years ago, the one I don't have at the moment, or the one I'm going to have in the future?

You're kind of a funny story, too.

SomervilleGirl

8:17 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

It's inappropriate to ask where someone works. There are wackos on some of these forums and people need to remain anonymous for good reasons. GET IT? I believe I have already answered that question already to someone else. I have a job and you don't need to know where that is--because it is none of your business and has nothing to do with posting, unless you are suggesting that you would be intruding upon our privacy and trying to create problems.

Comment_arrow

Janellen27

10:06 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

You're going to get all appropriate and righteous and proper tonight after breaking the rules yourself last night with your poster buddy, harassing me and others?

For the record, I tried for a long time to delete my comment this afternoon and notified the Editor of such. The command will not go through, so just try to do deep breathing and stretches because there's nothing can be done about it on my end. I really don't care where you work. Meanwhile, I see you've been getting a taste of your own medicine. Carry on . . .

TMHSGrad

8:44 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I think she meant "What street corner do you work on?"

SomervilleGirl

9:00 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

People can be sued for harassing on the internet. Are you aware of cyber-laws? Maybe you should review the policies if you were able to pass reading comprehension 101 in "HS". It appears the age factor is showing with all the day and night marathon postings. Does mom and day pay all your bills? Can't get a job? It's really sad this group of Brown supporters can't face the facts. It explains a great deal about the losing candidate and the people his aligned. Maybe try volunteering at a homeless shelter, you may learn something more than "it's all about me", an your white picket fence. The suburban flight is real and I understand why they leave. This is the kind of neighbor you would have to deal with --small towns, small minds. I've seen it all before and they too have claimed to have wife swapping and monogamy--how does that work?

Comment_arrow

TMHSGrad

9:09 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Which are you, SlummervilleGirl - the pot, or the kettle?

"Yeah, he probably goes both ways in other respects"
"Are you a friend of the family? Sounds like it."
"She's crying because her husband told her they have to move to Mexico because he refuses to pay taxes to Obama and the IRS is going after their off shore tax haven account."
"Posing with two daughters in string bikinis, without wife....who could that be. Is that what good fathers do?"
"This must be the other sour patch who were promised jobs."

Look familiar?

SomervilleGirl

9:18 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

The thing to watch is that trust fund. You never know when those friends may need to collect their big debts owed.

The editor has closed comments for this article.