Ryan Grannan-Doll
-
The Basics
-
Ryan on Patch
-
More Stuff
Comments
-
On the article Man Allegedly Confessed to Role in Waltham Murders
-
On the article Hearing Soon for Proposed Cat Shelter
Ryan Grannan-Doll
2:46 pm on Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Frosty,
Delete your cat comment within 15 minutes, or I will. It's offensive and does not move the conversation ahead.
-
On the article Parking Ticket Gives More Insight Into Watertown Shootout
Ryan Grannan-Doll
12:50 pm on Wednesday, May 22, 2013
ReplyA comment was deleted because it contained an inappropriate remark about Muslims.
-
On the article Waltham Cop Facing Child Porn Charges Returns to Court Today
Ryan Grannan-Doll
12:20 pm on Wednesday, May 22, 2013
ReplyAudrey,
Again, you have made your point. Please, move on to another topic. Your comments are not moving the discussion about the actual story ahead. Patch reserves the right to moderate comments and ban users. You can review our Terms of Service at waltham.patch.com/terms
-
On the article Waltham Cop Facing Child Porn Charges Returns to Court Today
Ryan Grannan-Doll
10:08 am on Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Audrey, you have made your point many times now. I think it's time to move on to another point. Thank you.
-
On the article Hearing Soon for Proposed Cat Shelter
-
On the article Wayward Bear Spotted in Weston
Ryan Grannan-Doll
6:19 pm on Tuesday, May 21, 2013
ReplyHas anybody else spotted the bear recently?
-
On the article Recent Waltham Arrests: Indecent Exposure Charge
Ryan Grannan-Doll
9:49 am on Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Reply@Silvercan,
Also, the federal government still considers the possession and consumption of marijuana illegal.
-
On the article Recent Waltham Arrests: Indecent Exposure Charge
Ryan Grannan-Doll
9:48 am on Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Reply@Silvercan, That is not true. This is true: the possession of less than one ounce of marijuana is no longer a criminal act. It is a civil violation of the law punishable by a fine. See link: http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2008/11/question_2_setu.html
-
On the article Waltham Cop Facing Child Porn Charges Arrested Again
Ryan Grannan-Doll
10:37 am on Monday, May 20, 2013
ReplyAudrey,
Thanks for reading. I understand the case quite well and we are not trying to send people into a "feeding frenzy." I have clarified the story. The old reference to children ages 7 - 11 was actually old information from the first arrest. In this new story, it was mistakenly included as new info.
Ryan Grannan-Doll
3:52 pm on Wednesday, May 22, 2013
A comment has been deleted because it contained inappropriate information.